• Make a contribution
  • Get the Print Edition
  • Sign up for our daily newsletter
Thursday, May 22, 2025
  • Login
Reading Today Online
  • HOME
  • YOUR AREA
    • All
    • Caversham
    • Central Reading
    • East Reading
    • Katesgrove
    • Reading
    • Southcote & Coley
    • Tilehurst & Norcot
    • Whitley

    Council announces fresh wave of cost of living support

    Knife crime in Thames Valley down nearly 10% last year, ONS figures show

    Nearly 100 singers raised their voices for women’s health

    TK Maxx moves to The Oracle, gives customers the chance to win a gift card

    Man wanted for dangerous driving and failing to stop

    Woman in her seventies sexually assaulted on bus in Reading

    Government announces unified parking app rollout

    Four in a row for BAPCO

    Broad Street Beats bolsters wellbeing during Mental Health Awareness Week

  • COMMUNITY
  • READING FC
  • SPORT
    • All
    • Basketball
    • Football
    • Rugby

    Former Reading FC manager Ruben Selles linked with League One job

    Four in a row for BAPCO

    Reading fans – you can finally dare to dream again

    Rob Couhig reveals new Reading FC CEO following takeover

    It’s a podium streak for Wokingham racing star Bobby with a win at Silverstone

    Rams RFC celebrate at end of season ball

    Lewis hits brilliant century to see Berkshire CCC beat Buckinghamshire

    ‘Without you, there would be no club’: Defender sends farewell message to Reading FC fans

    Style and splendour returns to Newbury

  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • ARTS
    • READING FESTIVAL
    • READING PRIDE
    • WOKINGHAM FESTIVAL
  • PRIDE OF READING
  • OBITUARIES
  • JOBS
  • ADVERTISE
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Reading Today Online
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

Opinions divided over proposal to unite the suburbs into a ‘Greater Reading’

James Aldridge, local democracy reporter by James Aldridge, local democracy reporter
Saturday, April 12, 2025 6:05 am
in Featured, Reading
A A
Reading

Reading

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Opinions are divided over whether suburbs should be subsumed into a ‘Greater Reading’ council as part of the government’s devolution plans.

The Labour government is moving forward with English devolution plans that involve the creation of new local authorities made up of 500,000 people or more.

Olivia Bailey, the Labour MP for Reading West and Mid Berkshire, and Liz Terry (Labour, Coley) the leader of Reading Borough Council (RBC) have both argued that residents in Tilehurst and Calcot should have the opportunity to unite with Reading Borough to create ‘Greater Reading’.

But neighbours living on the opposite side of Reading, in Earley, are divided over whether they should be incorporated as well.

Earley is currently under Wokingham Borough Council (WBC)’s jurisdiction.

Most neighbours appear to have rejected the idea.

Related posts

Council announces fresh wave of cost of living support

Knife crime in Thames Valley down nearly 10% last year, ONS figures show

There’s still time to sign up for the Three Counties Cycle Ride

Nearly 100 singers raised their voices for women’s health

The Greater Reading proposal has been discussed on the Earley Residents Discussion Board public Facebook group.

Jo Hewlett said: “Absolutely not. Two completely different demographics. The way RBC has performed over many years is not something we want for our area.

“I have no association with Reading and relate far more to Wokingham.”

Councillor Pauline Jorgensen (Conservative, Hillside), leader of the opposition on WBC said: “It sounds like a disaster waiting to happen, I remember Berkshire County Council – too big, unresponsive, only interested in providing services in urban centres – we would just become cash cows.”

Sarah Fellows said: “We spend more time in Wokingham than Reading, especially the town centres as Wokingham has far more to do for young children. We rarely go into Reading.”

Supporting unity with Reading, Malcolm John Haines said: “I think it’s a great idea. While an established, historical settlement in its own right (see 1086 Domesday entry), Earley has always been more closely linked to Reading.

“Plus, it would put a stop to the ridiculous snobbery of Lower Earley folk who claim to be from Wokingham, which is actually six miles away.”

Exhibiting a more agnostic position, Stewart Campbell said: “I feel Earley is separate from both Reading and Wokingham, to be honest.

“I don’t feel any affinity with Reading but I also feel Wokingham neglects Earley.”

Lee Swinerd said: “People say about RBC being inept, but if you change the boundaries then you’d get a new suite of councillors on RBC who will better serve residents of Earley, Lower Earley, Woodley, Calcot, etc.

“So people are not comparing apples to apples. Current RBC would be very different from future RBC. For example, do you think Cllr Jorgensen would put up with some of their current policies? No, me neither.

“I’m completely disaffiliated with Wokingham and WBC. I use Reading much more than Wokingham. WBC needs to bite the dust.”

Angie Burnish reflected on how dividing Earley into WBC and East Reading into RBC can cause complications.

She said: “In the 90s when the unitary authorities were created and we found ourselves in Wokingham District (as it was then) everything went downhill.

“Things like play schemes and libraries that were literally just five minutes walk away were suddenly either barred to us, or we had to jump through numerous hoops and pay more to access them. And were told that the Wokingham equivalents were a 40-minute bus ride away in a town we didn’t know.

“We are still registered at the same GP we were at when we lived at Cemetery Junction (because it’s close and a good surgery), but the complications it causes being registered with a GP in a different borough has to be experienced to be believed especially if you somebody in the family with complex health and social care needs.

“The only reason I ever have to go into Wokingham is for a meeting or appointment at the council offices – it’s not as if there ever would be any other reason to go there because I can’t see it’s got anything to offer that Reading hasn’t got, but better and far easier to get to because all the public transport where I live is centred on Reading.”

Interim proposals for devolution were submitted in March, with full proposals due in November.

Keep up to date by signing up for our daily newsletter

We don’t spam we only send our newsletter to people who have requested it.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Previous Post

Businesses secure offices at Reading town centre building tipped for flats

Next Post

Football round-up: Odama and Green strike for the Sumas

FOLLOW US

POPULAR STORIES

  • Young man and woman attacked by group of teenagers in Reading robbery

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Former Reading FC star to be released as free agent by Championship club

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Former Reading FC star to become free agent following Championship relegation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Thousands experience power outage in Reading, not expected to be fixed for hours

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Reading FC group Sell Before We Dai makes generous donation following end of campaign

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

RDG.Today – which is a Social Enterprise – provides Reading Borough with free, independent news coverage.

If you are able, please support our work

Click Here to Support RDG.Today

ABOUT US

Reading Today is dedicated to providing news online across the whole of the Borough of Reading. It is a Social Enterprise, existing to support the various communities in Reading Borough.

CONTACT US

news@wokinghampaper.co.uk

Reading Today Logo

Keep up to date with our daily newsletter

We don’t spam we only send our newsletter to people that have subscribed

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The Wokingham Paper Ltd publications are regulated by IPSO – the Independent Press Standards Organisation.
If you have a complaint about a  The Wokingham Paper Ltd  publication in print or online, you should, in the first instance, contact the publication concerned, email: editor@wokingham.today, or telephone: 0118 327 2662. If it is not resolved to your satisfaction, you should contact IPSO by telephone: 0300 123 2220, or visit its website: www.ipso.co.uk. Members of the public are welcome to contact IPSO at any time if they are not sure how to proceed, or need advice on how to frame a complaint.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • MY AREA
    • Central Reading
    • East Reading
    • Bracknell
    • Calcot
    • Caversham
    • Crowthorne
    • Earley
  • COMMUNITY
  • SPORT
    • Reading FC
    • Football
    • Rugby
    • Basketball
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • ARTS
    • READING FESTIVAL
    • READING PRIDE
    • WOKINGHAM FESTIVAL
  • PRIDE OF READING
  • OBITUARIES
  • JOBS
  • ADVERTISE
  • CONTACT US
  • SUPPORT US
  • SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
  • WHERE TO GET THE PRINT EDITION

© 2021 - The Wokingham Paper Ltd - All Right Reserved.